according to Samsung has beat a retrial to reconsider damages in its patent suit versus Apple. Chaebol-versus-Cupertino was revived courtesy of Judge Lucy Koh in the Northern territory of California, who agreed with Samsung which it's worth revisiting the 2012 decision which handed Apple US$399 million. After losing in various jurisdictions, it fronted the Supreme court of law in 2016. The Supreme court of law decided in favour of the South Korean firm in December 2016, sending the status back drop the line, leading to this week's decision [PDF] with Judge Koh. Submissions for the retrial are determine for December, and the jury experience is currently scheduled to begin in May 2018.
After Supreme court of law detour, Apple v. Samsung goes to a 4th jury trial
The Apple v. Samsung lawsuit is getting a large "reset," thanks to final year's Supreme court of law ruling on design patents. Further Reading Samsung victorious at Supreme court of law fight with 8-0 opinion versus Apple Meanwhile, a whole breaking up status moved forward in that Apple sued over a new generation of Samsung products. The high court of law threw out $399 mn of the damages Apple had won. There are 2 types of patents: design patents cover how something looks, while utility patents cover how something is used and works. The US Supreme court of law told that it was wrong to give Apple damages on the entire smartphone because of a few design patents.
"I would prefer to not save doing this until I retire," tells judge, as Apple & Samsung head back to court
as informed in District court of law Judge Lucy Koh has said Apple and Samsung that she would like to see a last finish to the five-year legal fight over patent infringements with the Korean company. Samsung argued that it was continue also much and fought the status all how to the Supreme court of law – where it won. Judge Koh had earlier warned Apple that the onus would be on it to make the status for saving the damages endeed awarded. This is because the Supreme court of law rejected the century-old way with that the damages were calculated. I similarly wish I won't be writing about the status until I retire …Photo: Reuters/Dado RuvicCheck out 9to5Mac on YouTube for further Apple news:
Why Samsung doesn't win Apple where it matters
Samsung's competition with Apple is on premium smartphone ($400+) market share, and Apple is crushing Samsung in this market. Samsung is a output innovation powerhouse, relleasing state-of-the-art devices that compete head to head with Apple's mobile products and getting rave reviews. You can't Utilize the iPhone without having an account with Apple, that means that Apple knows a lot about you. Contrary to that, Samsung depends on its sister company, Samsung SDS, for many of its internal discounds and marketing capabilities. Samsung could lock this gap with Apple if its Korean leadership going to change the culture, prioritizing and investing in discounds and marketing innovation.
Apple V Samsung Judge: "I would prefer not to save doing this until I retire"
Over the final 5 years, Apple and Samsung have been going at it in court, arguing over patents that date back to the Galaxy S2 and the iPhone 3GS. The Apple V. Samsung status going to have a new experience on the 14th of May 2018, at that point, the situation going to hopefully be put to rest entirely. The retrial was awarded to Samsung after the firm went to the Supreme Court, arguing that the damages awarded to Apple were unfair. The firm made a final ditch effort in 2016, going to the Supreme court of law to discuss that the damages were calculated unfairly. The Supreme court of law agreed however decided to send the status back to the territory court of law for another evaluation.
Post a Comment